inspiruj.cz

Ahoj,
dostal jsem se k dalšímu channelingu. Myslím, že patří do trojlístku těch světově nejznámějších a nejuznávanějších. Ten trojlístek je pro mě: Orin, Abraham a Seth.

Bohužel celé je to v angličtině, ale pokud to pro vás není problém, tak to velmi doporučuji. Těchto pět krátkých videí určitě stojí za shlédnutí. Obsahují vysvětlení jednoho ze základních zákonů vesmíru - zákonu přitažlivosti - a to od toho nejzákladnějšího úvodu až po praktický návod jak s tímto zákonem pracovat.

Proč plavat proti proudu...

PS. Úvod prvního videa je trošku delší, ale pak se to rozjede..

Ještě jedno video na stejné téma:

Abraham-Hicks~There is no such thing as NO!

Ano to je vsetko super,ale preco sa potom Jane Roberts dozila len 55 rokov, ked bola medium a prinasala tieto uzasne informacie? Ci to Seth ju zabil? Prisla medzi prvymi s myslienkou, ze my si tvorime realitu. Ale ona si ju dako evidentne netvorila. Tiez jej vernym pomocnikom bol jej manzel, tak ako Hicksovci. Len mi nejde do hlavy, ci sa na tom snazia len zarobit alebo su az taky nabozensky new age fanatici a stale produkuju predrazene knihy o tom istom dookola. Dam vam len jednu radu ludia, netreba sa utiekat k tymto pochybnym vieram a dogmam, treba byt sam sebou. Podla mojich pokusov ten The secret slavny film ani nefunguje, vsetko je to urobene len aby to ludi chytilo na prve 2 dni, tak ako mna, potom vydrzi 5% ludi, ktori sa marne snazia aplikovat "zakony" opisovane v nom.

Ahoj, no je velmi tezke ted zpetne posuzovat neci jine zkusenosti a prozitky - myslim Jane Roberts, ale pravdepodobne plne nezila to, co prekladala, ale vazne tezko rici.
Trochu se tomu venuje i tento prispevek: viewtopic.php?f=65&t=443 a asi umis anglicky, takze prikladam tu cast, na kterou jsi se ptal:

Jane Roberts, by contrast, had a very "intense" (my word) life. She was not "bipping" as Esther was - but rather she'd formed a very fast moving stream for herself, lots of contrast, lots of resistance, and lots of asking - oh, so much asking of her own! And her experience here in this physical life included much pain and physical suffering - which, as we know from both Seth AND Abraham, is an INDICATOR of vibrational resistance. Jane Roberts was not, as Esther is, "used to" the higher vibrations. And as Robyn mentioned, and I think is important, the standpoint of the ASKER (Jane) will attract a different slant to the answer, and a different "translation" of the information. Don't forget that Seth, like Abraham, did not "inhabit" Jane, but rather "he" transmitted blocks of thought to her, as Abraham does to Esther. So the messages are coming through a real human being whose own experiences, desires and beliefs in this life are part of the filter. Esther decided long ago that she'd be "happy healthy happy healthy happy healthy - dead." Jane Roberts' experienced transition in a wildly different manner. It's ALL GOOD - the point is that the way Jane experienced her transition is an INDICATOR of her vibration on all of that! So is it any wonder that her translations of Seth's message about transition would be different than Esther's? The really important thing is that at the heart of these translations is the exact same truth.

Jinak jestli jde o tahani penez nebo ne, musi kazdy posoudit sam Rozhodne si nemyslim ze je to primarni motivace treba Hicksovych.. myslim, ze to ma hlavu a patu a cele je to neskutecne konzistentni a prakticky orientovane, a pozitivni zmeny muze kazdy pocitit behem kratke doby, co to zije..